African Response to Colonial Conquest
Senior 2 · History
African Response to Colonial Conquest
Lesson 1 of 5
20 min
Colonial conquest was not something that simply happened to Africans. African rulers and peoples made choices, under great pressure and with incomplete information, about how to protect their people, their land and their power. Historians group these choices into two broad forms: collaboration and resistance. This unit looks at both from the point of view of the Africans who made them.
Collaboration means co-operating with the colonial power, for example by signing treaties, supplying soldiers or helping to govern. Resistance means opposing colonial rule, by fighting or by refusing to co-operate.
It is tempting to call resisters "heroes" and collaborators "traitors". Historians avoid this. Most collaborators were not betraying Africa as a whole; there was no united "Africa" yet, only many separate states, some of them old rivals. A ruler who allied with the British against a neighbouring enemy was often doing what rulers everywhere do: seeking allies to survive. Many rulers also switched: Mwanga of Buganda collaborated and later rebelled, and Samori Touré signed treaties with the French before fighting them. Collaboration and resistance were strategies, and both could succeed or fail.
Question: Why did Buganda collaborate with the British while Bunyoro resisted?
Buganda's leading chiefs had just won the religious wars with British help, and they saw the British as allies against their old rival, Bunyoro. By collaborating, they gained guns, land and a guaranteed place in the new order. Bunyoro's king Kabalega, by contrast, had rebuilt his kingdom's power and army in the 1870s and 1880s and faced a British–Ganda alliance aimed directly at him. For Bunyoro, collaboration offered nothing but surrender to its enemies, so Kabalega fought. Each kingdom's choice followed from its own interests and history.
Tip
Exam technique: when explaining a ruler's choice, always name the threat they faced and what they hoped to gain. "Lewanika collaborated because he feared the Ndebele and hoped British protection would keep Barotseland intact" earns more marks than "Lewanika was a collaborator".
Define collaboration and resistance.
Solution. Collaboration is co-operating with the colonial power, for example by signing treaties or providing soldiers. Resistance is opposing colonial rule, by armed struggle or by refusing to co-operate.
Give three reasons why some African rulers collaborated.
Solution. Any three of: protection against local enemies; to gain or regain power; material rewards such as guns and land; realising European firepower could not be beaten; weakness after disease, drought or war; ties with missionaries.
Why do historians avoid calling all collaborators "traitors"?
Solution. Because Africa was made up of many separate states, often rivals, and rulers acted to protect their own people. Collaboration was a strategy, and many rulers both collaborated and resisted at different times.
Name one collaborator and one resister from East Africa.
Solution. Collaborator: any of Apolo Kagwa, Nabongo Mumia, Lenana, Kasagama. Resister: any of Kabalega, Mkwawa, Koitalel arap Samoei, the leaders of Maji Maji.
Remember
Sources and credits