Consequences of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi
Senior 3 · History and Citizenship
Consequences of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi
Lesson 1 of 5
25 min
Historians begin with evidence. Read these two sources about the human cost of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi, which lasted from 7 April to mid-July 1994, about 100 days.
"More than one million people are estimated to have perished."
Source A. United Nations, Outreach Programme on the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi in Rwanda, "Historical background".
The Government of Rwanda's count of the victims of the genocide is 1,074,017 people.
Source B. Count of victims by the Ministry of Local Government (MINALOC), as published by the National Commission for the Fight against Genocide (CNLG), whose work is now carried out by the Ministry of National Unity and Civic Engagement (MINUBUMWE).
Analysing the sources. Source A is an international organisation and gives an estimate; Source B is a national count, made by going from place to place and recording victims. Both lead to the same conclusion: more than one million people were killed in about 100 days. The victims were overwhelmingly Tutsi, targeted only because they were Tutsi. Hutu and others who opposed the genocide, or who tried to protect Tutsi, were also killed. A careful count matters because each number was a person with a name, and because exact evidence is the strongest answer to anyone who tries to deny or minimise the genocide.
Definition
Consequence: a result or effect of an event. Historians group the consequences of the genocide as human, socio-emotional, political and economic.
Genocide survivor: a person who was targeted during the genocide and escaped death. Example: a child who survived by hiding with a neighbour.
Trauma: deep emotional and psychological injury caused by a terrible experience. It can show as fear, nightmares, sadness or anger long after the event.
Socio-emotional consequences: effects on people's feelings, mental health and relationships with others.
Child-headed household: a home in which a child, often the eldest orphan, is responsible for younger brothers and sisters because no adult is left.
Resilience: the ability of people to recover, rebuild and continue living with purpose after great loss.
Consequences do not stand alone. The flowchart shows how the loss of parents led, step by step, to problems that lasted for years.
A source on mental health. In 2018 the Rwanda Biomedical Centre (RBC) carried out a national mental health survey of 19,110 people from the general population and 1,271 genocide survivors. The chart compares two of its findings.
Analysing the chart. Survivors were almost three times as likely as the general population to have major depression (35.0% against 12.0%), and nearly eight times as likely to have post-traumatic stress disorder, PTSD (27.9% against 3.6%). Twenty-four years after the genocide, its emotional wounds were still clearly visible.
Worked example: using the chart as evidence
Question: Use the chart to explain one socio-emotional consequence of the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi. (3 marks)
Name the consequence: long-lasting trauma among survivors.
Give the evidence: in 2018, 27.9% of genocide survivors surveyed had PTSD, against 3.6% of the general population (Rwanda Biomedical Centre).
Explain it: more than twenty years later, survivors still suffered far more from trauma-related illness than other Rwandans, so healing needs long-term care, not just a few years of help.
Survivors did not only suffer; they organised. IBUKA ("remember"), the umbrella organisation of survivors' associations, was founded in 1995. AVEGA Agahozo, an association of genocide widows, was also founded in 1995 and supported women with health care, counselling and income projects. AERG, the association of student survivors, was founded in 1996 at the National University of Rwanda; its members formed "artificial families" in which older students cared for younger ones. These groups show resilience: turning shared loss into mutual support.
Why might the anniversary of a terrible event bring back trauma even many years later? What can you, your class and your school do to support survivors respectfully during the commemoration period?
Warning
Use the right words. Write "the 1994 Genocide against the Tutsi". Do not describe it as a "civil war", "tribal fighting" or a clash between ethnic groups: such words hide the fact that it was a planned attempt to destroy a group. Hutu, Tutsi and Twa were social categories that colonial rule turned into fixed labels on identity cards; they are not races.
Look after yourself. If this lesson brings back painful memories, talk to a trusted adult, your school counsellor or a teacher. You do not have to carry it alone.
Tip
Group the consequences. In an exam, sort consequences under headings (human, socio-emotional, political, economic) and back each one with a fact. "Many children became orphans and some headed households" earns more than "many bad things happened".
Practice
Sources and credits