Consumer Behaviour
Senior 4 · Economics
Consumer Behaviour
Lesson 4 of 4
30 min
When the price of a staple food falls after a good harvest, a household buys more of it for two separate reasons. Potatoes are now cheap compared with bananas and rice, so the family swaps some of those for potatoes. And the family is also better off: the money it used to spend on potatoes now stretches further, as if its income had risen. Economists split the response to a price change into these two parts, the substitution effect and the income effect, and the split explains even the strange case of a good whose demand rises when its price rises.
In unit 2 you saw that the demand curve usually slopes downwards. Here you will measure the two effects behind that slope on an indifference map, and then measure the gain that buyers and sellers get from a market: consumer and producer surplus.
Definition
Price effect: the total change in the quantity of a good bought when its price changes, other things equal.
Substitution effect: the part of the price effect caused by the change in relative prices alone, with the consumer kept on her original indifference curve (real income held constant).
Income effect: the part caused by the change in real income (purchasing power) that the price change brings, with relative prices held at their new level.
Example: if a price fall raises purchases from 4 kg to 9 kg, and 2 kg of the rise would have happened even with real income unchanged, then the substitution effect is +2 kg and the income effect is +3 kg.
Uwera spends Frw 7,200 a week on Irish potatoes (X) and cooking bananas (Y). Bananas cost Frw 400 per kg. After a good harvest, potatoes fall from Frw 900 to Frw 400 per kg (illustrative prices). She ranks bundles by , so, as in lesson 3, she spends half her income on each good: .
| Point | Prices (, ) | Income | Bundle (X, Y) | Level of satisfaction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| E₁, before | 900, 400 | 7,200 | , on I₁ | |
| E₂, after | 400, 400 | 7,200 | , on I₂ | |
| C, compensated | 400, 400 | 4,800 | , back on I₁ |
Finding C. Take away just enough income to put Uwera back on her old curve I₁, but at the new prices. At those prices the MRS must equal , so ; and gives . That bundle costs francs, so the price fall is worth Frw 2,400 a week to her.
Reading the diagram. The move E₁ → C is along I₁, caused only by the new relative price: the substitution effect, +2 kg. The move C → E₂ is a parallel shift of the budget line, caused only by the rise in real income: the income effect, +3 kg. Together: kg, from 4 to 9. This method, which keeps the consumer on the original indifference curve, is due to Hicks.
Worked example 1: decomposing a price fall
A consumer with has Frw 4,800. . The price of X falls from Frw 600 to Frw 150. Find the substitution and income effects on X.
Before: , , so .
After: .
Compensated bundle C: at the new prices, , so . On the old curve: (and ).
Effects: substitution ; income ; total units. Both effects are positive, so X is a normal good.
The substitution effect always works against the price change: when a good becomes relatively cheaper, a consumer kept on the same indifference curve buys more of it, because indifference curves are convex. The income effect can go either way, depending on the type of good.
| Type of good (price falls) | Substitution effect | Income effect | Total effect on quantity | Demand curve |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal good | + (buy more) | + (more income, buy more) | Rises, by more than the substitution effect | Downward sloping |
| Inferior good | + | − (more income, buy less), but smaller | Rises, by less than the substitution effect | Downward sloping |
| Giffen good | + | − and larger than the substitution effect | Falls | Upward sloping |
So every Giffen good is an inferior good, but very few inferior goods are Giffen goods. For the income effect to win, the good must be inferior and take a large share of a very poor household's budget. Robert Jensen and Nolan Miller (2008) found such behaviour among very poor households in China: when the price of rice, their staple, was subsidised, some of them bought less rice and more meat.
Warning
The substitution effect is never "perverse". For a Giffen good it is the income effect that runs the wrong way and outweighs the substitution effect. Saying "for a Giffen good the substitution effect is positive when price rises" is wrong.
Definition
Consumer surplus (CS): the difference between the most consumers are willing to pay for a quantity of a good and what they actually pay. On a diagram it is the area below the demand curve and above the price.
Producer surplus (PS): the difference between the price producers receive and the lowest price at which they would have been willing to supply. It is the area above the supply curve and below the price.
Total (economic) surplus: , the net gain to society from trade in the market.
Example: if you would pay up to Frw 1,000 for a brochette and it costs Frw 800, your consumer surplus on it is Frw 200.
Consumer surplus rests on diminishing marginal utility. Each unit is worth less to buyers than the one before, yet every unit is sold at the same market price, so the earlier units bring a surplus. In a market for tomatoes at one town market (illustrative), demand is and supply is , with Q in kg per day and P in Frw per kg.
Equilibrium: , and .
Reading the diagram. The blue triangle is the gain buyers get by paying Frw 600 for kilograms they value at up to Frw 1,200. The orange triangle is the gain sellers get by receiving Frw 600 for kilograms some would have supplied for as little as Frw 200. Total surplus is Frw 100,000 a day, and it is largest at the free-market equilibrium.
Uses of the concepts. They measure who gains and loses from a tax, a subsidy or a price control; they show how a firm that charges different prices for different blocks of a good can turn consumer surplus into revenue (price discrimination); and governments use them in cost–benefit analysis, for example to value the time and money a new road saves its users.

Worked example 2: Rwanda's household electricity tariff
From 1 October 2025, households pay Frw 89 per kWh for their first 20 kWh in a month, Frw 310 per kWh from above 20 to 50 kWh, and Frw 369 per kWh above 50 kWh (VAT and regulatory fee excluded; REG, under RURA).
(a) Bill for 60 kWh. francs.
(b) Compared with a flat Frw 369 on every kWh: francs, so the block tariff leaves this household francs more consumer surplus, if it uses the same 60 kWh.
(c) Evaluation. The cheap first block protects the surplus of small users (a household using 20 kWh pays Frw 1,780 instead of Frw 7,380), while the higher blocks charge more where use, and willingness to pay, is greater. The tariff is a form of price discrimination by blocks: it collects part of the surplus of large users to keep basic lighting and phone charging affordable.
Tip
"Triangle above the price is the buyers'; triangle below is the sellers'." For straight-line curves, each surplus is : the base is the equilibrium quantity and the height is the gap between the price and where the curve meets the price axis.
Important
Discuss. If the price of a staple food rises sharply, which households lose most consumer surplus: those who spend a large share of their budget on it, or those who spend a small share? Use the income effect and the EICV7 food share from lesson 2 in your answer.
tutor2u, "Indifference Curves - Income and Substitution Effects for Normal Goods I A Level and IB Economics". Watch how the presenter draws the compensated budget line parallel to the new one and tangent to the old indifference curve, exactly as in the potato diagram above.
Practice
Key points
Further reading
Sources and credits
Written by Ganzaa: the text, the decomposition and surplus diagrams (drawn to scale from the equations), the tables, the worked examples and the practice items. The potato, banana and tomato prices are illustrative.
This lesson adapts CC BY-SA material and is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Quick check
The price of a normal good falls. How do the substitution effect and the income effect act on the quantity bought?