General Introduction to the History of Precolonial Rwanda
Senior 4 · History (Languages)
General Introduction to the History of Precolonial Rwanda
Lesson 4 of 4
25 min
Every year in early August, the Mwami handed new hoes to the ritualists in charge of cultivation, so that sorghum and finger millet could be sown. This was the first stage of umuganura, the first-fruits ritual, which ran in four phases from August to June and was the greatest of the 18 royal rituals of the ubwiru. This first stage took place at Huro.
One act, four meanings. Economic: it opened the farming year. Religious: it asked for blessing on the harvest. Political: it showed that prosperity flowed from the king. Social: every family repeated the celebration at home. This lesson analyses those four sides of life in the precolonial kingdom: how society was organised, what Rwandans believed and created, and how they made a living.
Definition
Clan (ubwoko): a group of people who claim a common, often mythical, ancestor and share a totem. Lineage (umuryango, inzu): a group of families who can trace their actual descent from one ancestor. Social category: a group defined by status, wealth or way of life, not by birth alone; in precolonial Rwanda, Hutu, Tutsi and Twa.
Clientship: a relationship in which a stronger party grants protection, land or the use of property in return for service. Barter: the direct exchange of goods for other goods, without money. Subsistence economy: one in which families produce mainly what they themselves consume.
Family, lineage and clan. The basic unit was the household (urugo, plural ingo). Households formed lineages, lineages formed sub-clans (amashyanga), and sub-clans formed clans. Writers list 15 to 18 clans in old Rwanda, among them the Abanyiginya, Abega, Abasinga, Abazigaba and Abagesera. Clan members were scattered across the country, but a clan gave a person friends and hospitality almost anywhere, and people usually married outside their own clan. Until 1960, a Rwandan asked "what are you?" would answer with a clan name.
Clans cut across the social categories. At least nine of the largest clans included Hutu, Tutsi and Twa members. A person could change social category, but never his or her clan. This is strong evidence that the categories were not separate "peoples" with separate origins.
Hutu, Tutsi and Twa. All three spoke Kinyarwanda, shared one set of religious beliefs and one culture of song, dance and poetry, and celebrated the same heroes. The word "Tutsi" seems first to have described an individual's status, a person rich in cattle; "Hutu" meant a subordinate, a follower of someone more powerful. Twa were the smallest group, many of them potters, hunters and gatherers. The categories were linked to wealth and way of life, and people could move between them as their fortunes rose or fell: a family that gained cattle could "shed Hutuness" (kwihutura). As the state grew in the 19th century, especially under Rwabugiri, "Tutsi" came to mean the ruling elite and "Hutu" the mass of ordinary subjects, and the categories hardened; but the lines were not yet fixed across the whole country when Europeans arrived.
Much of social and economic life ran through three relationships between stronger and weaker parties:
Weigh the evidence. Alexis Kagame, followed by the Belgian anthropologist Jacques Maquet, described ubuhake as the heart of a harmonious society. Later research, which took account of uburetwa, largely disproved that idyllic picture: the labour contract was degrading and fell on the poorest. A balanced answer recognises both the protection that clientship could offer and the inequality it carried.

Inteko y'Umuco (Rwanda Cultural Heritage Academy): "i Huro nk'ahantu ndangamurage" ("Huro as a heritage site"), in Kinyarwanda, about 3 minutes. It explains the history of Huro hill and its link with umuganura, and the saying "Ihuriro ni i Huro". Listen for why the ritual was held at one particular place.
| Activity | What it involved |
|---|---|
| Farming | Most people were cultivators who also kept small stock and sometimes a few cattle. Sorghum, finger millet and beans were key crops, and food tribute was collected at the bean and sorghum harvests; the king's estates had banana groves. Granaries stored the grain. |
| Cattle keeping | Cattle were wealth and prestige. Rulers counted their wealth in cattle and won followers by granting them. A smaller number of people lived mainly from large herds. |
| Land tenure | Ubukonde (lineage land); igikingi, grazing rights granted by the king or the pasture chief, the most common system right up to the colonial period, especially in the centre and south; inkungu, abandoned land the authority could redistribute; and gukeba, settling families on grazing or fallow land. |
| Crafts and iron | Iron-working went back to the Early Iron Age (Lesson 1); hoes were essential tools, so important that the king handed them out to open the farming year. Potters, basket-makers, woodworkers, metalworkers and weavers made goods for use and exchange. |
| Hunting and gathering | Practised especially by Twa communities, who also made pottery. |
| Trade | Barter, the direct exchange of goods, long before Europeans came; craft goods were made largely for exchange. Around Lake Kivu, trade between very different regions was carried on on a large scale without organised markets, and flourished independently of the state. Money came into use only around 1930. |
| Tribute | Produce, cattle and labour flowed to chiefs and the court (Lesson 3). Around 1870 Rwabugiri set up a court at Rubengera that collected food tribute and served as a reserve in times of shortage. |


Warning
Hutu, Tutsi and Twa were social categories, not races or "tribes". They shared one language, religion and culture, the same clans contained all three, and people could move between them. Do not write that they had different origins or different "natures": those ideas were invented by colonial writers (Unit 5). And do not paint precolonial Rwanda as either a paradise of harmony or a simple system of oppression: use the evidence of both ubuhake and uburetwa.
Tip
Organise any "organisation of precolonial Rwanda" essay with SCE and three examples each. Social: clans, categories, clientship. Cultural: Imana and kubandwa, oral literature and the arts, umuganura. Economic: farming, cattle, crafts and trade, tribute.
Important
Discuss. Clans included Hutu, Tutsi and Twa, and people could change category but not clan. What does this suggest about the colonial claim that the three were separate races? Why might Rwandans today be interested in clans as a symbol of unity?
Practice
Key points
Further reading
Sources and credits
Written by Ganzaa: the clientship diagram, the tables, SCE and the exercises. This lesson adapts CC BY-SA material and is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Quick check
A person in precolonial Rwanda could change social category but could not change clan.