Business Organisation and Start-Up
Senior 4 · Entrepreneurship
Business Organisation and Start-Up
Lesson 3 of 3
23 min
Umutoni runs a small bakery in Huye that is genuinely profitable, but she is turning customers away because her old mixer cannot keep up. A new dough mixer costs 6,000,000 Frw and would last about eight years. She has 1,500,000 Frw saved. The other 4,500,000 Frw has to come from somewhere — and the somewhere she chooses will decide whether the mixer makes her richer or buries her under repayments she cannot meet.
Every business faces some version of Umutoni’s problem: a good idea, or a good opportunity, needs money before it can earn money. This lesson does two things. First it lays out where start-up and growth money realistically comes from in Rwanda. Then it teaches the skill that actually separates surviving businesses from failed ones: matching the right source of finance to the particular need.
Before the list, fix two distinctions that organise all of it.
Internal versus external. Internal finance comes from inside the business or the owner — own savings and profit that is kept and reinvested. External finance comes from outside — loans, investors, suppliers, grants.
Debt versus equity. This is the one that matters most. Debt is money you borrow: you must repay it, usually with interest, but you keep every share of ownership. Equity is money an investor gives you in exchange for a share of ownership: you never repay it, but you hand over a slice of all future profit and some control. Hold that difference; it decides the whole shape of a financing choice.
The mixer lasts about eight years, so it is a long-term asset. Two realistic options:
Option A — a bank term loan. Borrow 4,500,000 Frw at 16% simple interest per year, repaid over 3 years. Interest = principal × rate × time = 4,500,000 × 0.16 × 3 = 2,160,000 Frw. Total repaid = 4,500,000 + 2,160,000 = 6,660,000 Frw. She keeps 100% of her bakery.
Option B — equity. An investor offers 4,500,000 Frw for a 30% share of the bakery. She repays nothing and the investor shares the risk if things go badly — but she now keeps only 70% of the business, and 30% of every future profit goes to the investor. The deal also implies a value for the whole bakery: if 30% is worth 4,500,000 Frw, then 100% is worth 4,500,000 ÷ 0.30 = 15,000,000 Frw.
Which is better? It depends on how well she expects the bakery to do. If it grows strongly, 30% of it will soon be worth far more than the 2,160,000 Frw of interest — so the loan is the cheaper choice, because she keeps the upside. If the bakery might struggle, equity is safer, because there is nothing to repay in a bad month. What is not in doubt is that a mixer needs long-term finance: paying for an eight-year asset with 30-day trade credit or an overdraft would mean the repayment falls due long before the mixer has earned its cost back.
That last point is the golden rule, stated plainly next.
Do not ask ‘where can I get money?’ Ask ‘what is this money for, and for how long?’ Four tests decide a good match.
Tip
Before taking on any finance, ask yourself two questions and let the answers choose the source:
In an evaluation question, always name the trade-off: debt keeps ownership but must be repaid; equity needs no repayment but costs you a share of the future.
Mugisha borrows 2,000,000 Frw at 18% simple interest per year, to be repaid after 2 years. How much interest will he pay, and what is the total he repays?
Answer. Interest = 2,000,000 × 0.18 × 2 = 720,000 Frw. Total repaid = 2,000,000 + 720,000 = 2,720,000 Frw.
An investor pays 6,000,000 Frw for a 40% share of a business. What is the implied value of the whole business, and what share does the founder keep?
Answer. Whole business = 6,000,000 ÷ 0.40 = 15,000,000 Frw. The founder keeps 100% − 40% = 60% — with no repayment to make, but 40% of all future profit now belonging to the investor.
A carpenter needs (a) timber to fill this month’s orders, and (b) a wood-cutting machine that will last ten years. Match a suitable source of finance to each, and say why.
Answer. (a) Timber is a short-term need, so trade credit from the timber supplier (or a short SACCO loan) fits — it is repaid quickly, out of the sales the timber generates. (b) The machine is a long-term asset, so a term loan or a lease fits, repaid over years as the machine earns its cost back. Funding the machine with 30-day trade credit would fall due long before it had paid for itself.
Which of these must be repaid, and which need not: a bank loan, a grant, equity finance?
Answer. A bank loan must be repaid, with interest. A grant need not be repaid at all. Equity need not be repaid either — but unlike a grant, it costs the founder a permanent share of ownership and future profit.
A new business with no assets and no trading history wants 1,000,000 Frw to start. Explain why a big commercial bank loan is unlikely, and name two more realistic sources.
Answer. A bank normally requires collateral and a track record to secure repayment, and a brand-new business has neither, so the bank sees too much risk and refuses. More realistic sources are the owner’s own savings, a SACCO loan (smaller and often group-guaranteed rather than needing land), family, or a grant from a fund such as the BDF. New businesses almost always start on these before they can access bank finance.
Note
What to remember