Development Trends in Rwanda
Senior 6 · English
Development Trends in Rwanda
Lesson 2 of 4
25 min
Let's begin
A development plan is a list of promises with numbers attached. In this lesson you listen to a talk that explains the goals of Vision 2050 and NST2 in plain language, and you note the figures precisely: what, how much, by when. Then you work in groups to decide which priorities should come first, and defend your choices with reasons and evidence.
Important
Listening script: for one reader
Only the reader opens the script; everyone else keeps it closed until the tasks are finished. About three minutes. Ms Uwimana, a planning officer speaking at a school's careers and citizenship day, is imagined; the goals and figures she quotes come from MINECOFIN's NST2.
Good morning, everyone. I've been asked to talk about Rwanda's development plans, which sounds like the dullest subject on today's programme. I'll try to prove that it isn't, because these plans are about your future more than anyone else's.
Let's start with the long view. Vision 2050 sets two milestones: Rwanda aims to become an upper-middle-income country by 2035, and a high-income country by 2050. In 2035 most of you will be in your late twenties; in 2050 you'll be in your forties. So these are not dates in a distant history book. They're dates in your own lives.
A vision is a direction, not a plan. The plan comes in five-year strategies. The current one, NST2, runs from 2024 to 2029, and what I like about it is that its goals come with numbers. Let me give you four.
First, jobs. The strategy aims to create one and a quarter million productive jobs in five years. That's two hundred and fifty thousand a year, or, if you like, roughly one new job every two minutes, day and night, for five years.
Second, exports. In 2023 Rwanda earned about three and a half billion US dollars from selling goods and services abroad. The target is seven point three billion by 2029: more than double. That's why you'll hear so much about manufacturing, mining, tourism and agro-processing.
Third, savings. The plan aims to double the national savings rate, from twelve point four per cent of GDP to almost twenty-six per cent. A country that saves more can invest more of its own money, instead of borrowing it.
Fourth, and to me the most important: children. A third of children under five are stunted, and the target is to bring that down to fifteen per cent. That's more than halving it.
Now, why tell students all this? Because about sixty-five per cent of Rwandans are under thirty. If the jobs target is met, many of those jobs will be yours. If the export target is met, some of those exports will be things that you design, grow or sell. And if the targets are missed, you'll be the ones who notice first.
So my request is simple: read the plans for yourselves, check the numbers each year, and ask your leaders, politely and with evidence, how things are going. Thank you.
| Goal | Starting point | Target | By when |
|---|---|---|---|
| Income status | — | (1) … ; high-income | 2035; 2050 |
| Jobs | — | (2) … in five years | 2029 |
| Exports | about US$3.5 billion (2023) | (3) … | 2029 |
| National savings rate | (4) … of GDP | almost 26% of GDP | 2029 |
| Stunting | (5) … | 15% | 2029 |
Table: (1) upper-middle-income; (2) 1.25 million productive jobs (250,000 a year); (3) US$7.3 billion; (4) 12.4%; (5) 33% (a third of children under five).
Definition
Words for describing goals

The Road to NST2: Episode 1, from the YouTube channel of Rwanda's Ministry of ICT and Innovation (about 5 minutes, 2025). The ministry introduces what the next five years hold for digital development. Note one goal it describes and the language it uses for the future; remember that a ministry presents its own work, so compare its claims with independent figures.
No country can do everything at once. In groups of four, rank nine priorities in a diamond: the most important at the top, two in the second row, three in the middle, two below them, and the least urgent at the bottom. Then defend your diamond to another group.
| Job | Useful language |
|---|---|
| giving an opinion with a reason | I'd put … at the top, because … · In my view, … matters most, since … |
| supporting it with evidence | The figures show that … · According to NST2, … |
| disagreeing politely | I see what you mean, but … · I'm not convinced that … · That's true up to a point; however, … |
| linking priorities | … depends on … · Without …, there can't be … · … would also help … |
| reaching agreement | Can we agree that …? · Shall we compromise and put … in the middle row? · So we've decided that … |
Worked example
A model exchange: opinion, reason, evidence, response
Gatete: I'd put jobs for young people at the top, because youth unemployment was 20.8% in 2023, according to NST2. Without jobs, nothing else feels like progress.
Umutoni: I see what you mean, but I'm not convinced. A child who is stunted at five may struggle at school for years, and NST2 says a third of under-fives are stunted. Jobs depend on healthy, educated workers.
Gatete: That's true up to a point; however, stunting takes years to show results. Young people need work now.
Umutoni: Shall we compromise? Jobs at the top, and stunting and education side by side in the second row, because both prepare the workers of 2035.
Notice: each opinion has a reason; each reason has evidence with a source; and the disagreement ends in a decision, not a quarrel.
Tip
Link, don't just list. The strongest arguments show how priorities depend on each other: "Electricity in every cell would help small workshops, which would create jobs." A chain of reasons persuades better than three separate ones.
Warning
Practice
Sources and credits