Individual and Society
Senior 4 · General and Religious Studies
Individual and Society
Lesson 3 of 4
25 min
Eric (an illustrative student) will finish S6 next year. He has three serious options: a university degree paid for with a student loan, a two-year technical (TVET) course in electrical installation near home, or starting a small phone-repair business with savings and a loan from his uncle. His friends tell him to follow them to university. His mother wants him near home. He likes repairing phones, but he is not sure he could earn enough.
Eric could choose by feeling, by following his friends, or by tossing a coin. Or he could use a process. A process does not guarantee the right answer, but it makes it far less likely that he will choose blindly and regret it. This lesson teaches the process and a tool, the decision matrix, that turns his values into numbers he can compare.
Definition
Decision: a choice between two or more possible courses of action. Decision-making: the process of reaching that choice.
Alternative: one of the possible courses of action. Eric has three.
Criterion (plural criteria): a standard used to judge the alternatives. Example: cost, interest, chance of a job.
Consequence: what follows from a choice, for you and for others, in the short and the long term.
Rational decision: one reached by gathering information and weighing the alternatives against clear criteria. Impulsive decision: one made quickly, on emotion or pressure, without weighing alternatives.
Worked example: Eric's decision matrix
Eric chooses four criteria and gives each a weight (how much it matters to him, from 1 to 3). He scores each option from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) on each criterion. For cost, 5 means cheapest for his family. A weighted score is the score multiplied by the weight.
| Criterion (weight) | University | TVET course | Phone-repair business |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interest in the work (×3) | 4 → 12 | 3 → 9 | 4 → 12 |
| Chance of a steady income (×3) | 3 → 9 | 5 → 15 | 3 → 9 |
| Cost to the family (×2) | 2 → 4 | 4 → 8 | 3 → 6 |
| Near home (×1) | 2 → 2 | 4 → 4 | 5 → 5 |
| Total | 27 | 36 | 32 |
Working for the TVET course: 3 × 3 + 5 × 3 + 4 × 2 + 4 × 1 = 9 + 15 + 8 + 4 = 36. The TVET course scores highest.
Test the result. What if interest mattered much more to Eric, with a weight of 5? University: 4 × 5 + 9 + 4 + 2 = 35; TVET: 3 × 5 + 15 + 8 + 4 = 42; business: 4 × 5 + 9 + 6 + 5 = 40. The TVET course still wins, so the result is robust. Eric also notices that the business came second both times: combining the TVET course with part-time phone repair, a fourth alternative, might be better than either.
| Influence | How it can help | How it can mislead |
|---|---|---|
| Values | Keep the choice consistent with who you want to be | Rarely misleads, unless you have not thought them through |
| Family | Experience, support, knowledge of you | Their wishes may not fit your talents |
| Peers | Encouragement, shared information | Pressure to follow the group |
| Culture and faith | Moral guidance, community wisdom | Customs may be applied without asking if they fit |
| Emotions | Signal what really matters to you | Anger, fear or excitement rush the choice |
| Information | Good evidence makes good choices | Rumours and false posts lead you astray |
| Law | Sets limits that protect you and others | Ignoring it brings penalties and harm |
Communities make decisions too. Article 10 of Rwanda's Constitution commits the State to a "constant quest for solutions through dialogue and consensus", and home-grown solutions such as Umushyikirano (the National Dialogue) and Imihigo (performance contracts) are listed by the Rwanda Governance Board. A group decision follows the same seven steps, but step 4 becomes a discussion in which every member is heard, and step 5 aims at a choice that all can accept.

Warning
Four traps
Tip
Pause, list, weigh. For a big decision: pause (never decide in the heat of the moment), list at least three alternatives, and weigh them against criteria you write down before you score. Writing the criteria first stops you from bending them to fit the option you already like.
Important
Discuss. Is a decision matrix too cold for decisions about people, such as whom to marry or whether to forgive someone? Which steps of the process still apply to such decisions, and which do not?
Lauren Kress: "The 7 step decision making process", about 3 minutes. Notice why she says the first step is to define the problem, not to brainstorm solutions, and compare her seven steps with Figure 3.
Practice
Key points
Sources and credits
Written by Ganzaa: Eric's case, Figure 3, the decision matrix, the tables and the exercises.
This lesson adapts CC BY-SA material and is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Quick check
Put the steps of the decision-making process in order.
Tap the cards in the right order.