Concept of an Ecosystem
Senior 6 · Biology
Concept of an Ecosystem
Lesson 5 of 5
25 min
The Rugezi wetland, about 6 700 hectares of peat marsh at around 2 050 m in the north of Rwanda, filters and regulates the water that flows into Lakes Burera and Ruhondo, and so supports hydroelectric power generation downstream. In past decades, parts of it were drained for farming and for water management. The marsh's water table dropped and the levels of the lakes below it fell. Recognising its value, Rwanda listed Rugezi–Burera–Ruhondo as its first Wetland of International Importance under the Ramsar Convention on 1 December 2005 and set out to restore it.
Rugezi shows the three themes of this lesson: people need land and food from ecosystems; using them carelessly damages the services they provide; and damaged ecosystems can be protected and restored.
Definition
Pollution: the release by human activity of substances or energy into the environment in amounts that harm living things or the services ecosystems provide. The harmful substance is a pollutant.
Ecosystem services: the benefits people get from ecosystems, such as food, clean water, flood control, pollination and carbon storage.
In-situ conservation: protecting species in their natural habitat, such as in a national park. Ex-situ conservation: protecting species outside their natural habitat, such as in a zoo, botanic garden or seed bank.
Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD): the mass of oxygen used by microorganisms to break down the organic matter in one litre of water, usually over 5 days at . Unit: . A high BOD means much organic pollution.
Rwanda's population depends heavily on farming, on a hilly land with little room to expand. Every method that increases food supply also changes ecosystems. Table 1 sets out the main effects and how they can be reduced.
Table 1: Farming practices, their ecological effects and mitigation
| Practice | Ecological effect | Mitigation |
|---|---|---|
| Clearing forest, draining wetlands for new fields | Habitat loss, the main cause of falling biodiversity; less water storage and carbon storage | Raise yields on existing farmland instead; protect forests and wetlands by law |
| Monoculture (one crop over large areas) | Low diversity; pests and diseases spread easily | Crop rotation, intercropping, agroforestry |
| Inorganic fertiliser | Runoff of nitrate and phosphate causes eutrophication | Apply the right amount at the right time; leave buffer strips of vegetation beside rivers |
| Pesticides | Kill non-target species such as bees; persistent ones biomagnify (Lesson 3) | Integrated pest management, biological control, less persistent chemicals |
| Cultivating steep slopes | Soil erosion: fertile topsoil and its phosphate are washed into rivers and lakes | Terraces, contour hedges of grasses such as napier, mulching, trees on the slopes |
Organic pollution and oxygen. Untreated sewage and waste from food factories such as coffee washing stations add organic matter to rivers. Aerobic bacteria break it down and multiply, using dissolved oxygen faster than it can dissolve back from the air. Figure 1 shows the result below a sewage outfall: the oxygen sag curve.
Figure 1: The oxygen sag curve below a sewage outfall (illustrative, modelled). Blue: dissolved oxygen. Orange, dashed: BOD. Green band: clean water upstream.
Eutrophication. When nitrate and phosphate from fertiliser, eroded soil or sewage enter a lake, a chain of events follows:
Other pollutants. Heavy metals such as mercury and lead from mining and waste are toxic and can biomagnify. Carbon dioxide and methane from fuel burning, cattle and rice fields enhance the greenhouse effect (Lesson 4). Plastics persist for centuries, block drains and break into microplastics that animals swallow.
Rwanda's plastics law. Rwanda banned polythene bags under Law N° 57 of 2008. Law N° 17 of 2019, in force from 23 September 2019, extends the ban to single-use plastic items, with exceptional permission handled by the Rwanda Environment Management Authority (REMA).
Worked example 1: reading the oxygen sag curve
Use Figure 1. (a) State the minimum dissolved oxygen concentration and where it occurs. (b) Explain why it occurs downstream of the outfall rather than at it. (c) Explain why the animals change along the river.

Warning
Common mistakes about eutrophication
Table 2: Comparing the two approaches
| In-situ conservation | Ex-situ conservation |
|---|---|
| Examples: national parks (Volcanoes, Nyungwe, Akagera, Gishwati–Mukura); protected wetlands such as Rugezi; forest reserves | Examples: zoos with captive breeding; botanic gardens and arboreta; seed banks; frozen sperm, eggs and embryos |
| Advantages: protects the whole ecosystem and its interactions; species keep adapting to their natural conditions; many species are protected at once | Advantages: safe from poaching, habitat loss and disease outbreaks; allows breeding programmes; seeds keep for decades in a small space |
| Disadvantages: needs large areas and constant protection against poaching and encroachment; may conflict with local land needs | Disadvantages: only a few individuals, so little genetic diversity; animals may lose natural behaviour; expensive; does not protect the habitat |
Case study: bringing species back to Akagera. Akagera National Park is managed jointly by the Rwanda Development Board and the conservation organisation African Parks. Lions had been lost from the park; they were reintroduced from South Africa from July 2015. Eastern black rhinoceroses, absent for about ten years, returned in May 2017, when 18 were moved from South Africa, and in June 2019 five more arrived from zoos in Europe. White rhinoceroses followed in 2021 and 2025. The 2019 rhinos show the two approaches working together: animals bred ex situ in zoos were released in situ, adding new genes to the wild population. Such reintroductions succeed only because the park is fenced, patrolled and supported by the communities around it, who share in the park's revenue.
Worked example 2: why small populations lose genetic diversity
In a small population, some alleles are lost by chance each generation (genetic drift). A standard population-genetics result gives the expected heterozygosity (a measure of genetic diversity) after generations:
where is the effective population size (roughly, the number of breeding adults). Compare a captive group with and a wild population with , each over 10 generations.
Condition: the formula assumes random mating, no migration, no mutation and no selection, so it is a model, not a prediction.

CrashCourse: "Conservation and Restoration Ecology" (Crash Course Ecology #12). Watch for the difference between protecting an ecosystem and restoring one, and compare the examples with Rugezi and Akagera.
Tip
Exam technique for "evaluate" questions on conservation. Give points on both sides, then a judgement with a reason: "Ex-situ breeding saves the species from immediate extinction, but it cannot replace habitat; the best strategy combines both, as at Akagera." A one-sided answer, however detailed, cannot reach the top marks.
Practice: human impact and conservation
Key points
Further reading for this unit
Sources and credits
Figure 1, Tables 1 and 2, the worked examples and the practice questions are written by Ganzaa. Figure 1 is modelled from illustrative values (Streeter–Phelps oxygen-sag model).
This lesson adapts CC BY-SA material and is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.