Kingdoms and Empires in West, Central and South Africa
Senior 4 · History
Kingdoms and Empires in West, Central and South Africa
Lesson 1 of 5
25 min
Around 1068 the scholar al-Bakri, working in Córdoba in Muslim Spain, completed his Book of Routes and Realms. He never crossed the Sahara; he gathered reports from merchants who had. He described the capital of Ghana as two towns about 10 kilometres apart: one inhabited by Muslim merchants, the other by the king of Ghana.
In 1913 a 17th-century West African chronicle naming the capital "Koumbi" led French archaeologists to ruins at Koumbi Saleh, in today's Mauritania. They found a large Muslim town with stone houses and a congregational mosque. They have not found the king's town, and no inscription proves the site was Ghana's capital.

Read the two sources together. The text and the ruins agree that a Muslim merchant town stood here, but each has limits. Al-Bakri wrote at second hand, for readers in Spain and North Africa. The archaeology confirms the Muslim town but is silent about the king. Most written evidence for West Africa's early empires comes from outsiders writing in Arabic; the people's own memory survives mainly in oral tradition, kept by griots. A historian needs both.
Definition
Empire: a large state in which one ruler or people governs many other peoples and territories. Vassal state: a state that keeps its own ruler but owes tribute and obedience to a stronger one.
Trans-Saharan trade: trade by camel caravan across the Sahara between West Africa and North Africa, above all gold going north and salt coming south (you studied it in S1). Griot (jeli): a hereditary oral historian, praise-singer and adviser in Mande societies.
The Soninke called their state Wagadu; "Ghana" was a royal title that Arab writers used for the king, his capital and his kingdom. Its roots go back to farming and herding chiefdoms in the western Niger basin more than a thousand years before Christ.
A historians' debate. An old story says the Almoravids conquered Ghana in 1076–77. Modern scholars have sharply questioned it: Conrad and Fisher (1982) called it folklore built on a misreading of Arabic sources, and the first writer even to hint at a conquest, Ibn Khaldun, wrote 300 years later. Others accept Almoravid political pressure without a conquest. The lesson: a date repeated in many textbooks may rest on weak evidence.
Warning
Do not reduce these empires to "gold and salt". Trade explains their wealth, but an A-level answer also names political causes (strong leaders such as Sundiata, systems such as the farbas), military causes (cavalry, conquest) and religious and cultural ones (Islam's networks of scholars and merchants). And it says which evidence each claim rests on.
Tip
"Ghana taxed the gold; Mali held the gold." Ghana profited from controlling the trade routes without owning the gold fields; Mali, further south, controlled the fields of Bambuk and Bure themselves. That difference helps explain why Mali grew larger and richer.
Important
Discuss. Almost everything written about Ghana comes from Arab and Andalusian writers who never saw it, while the Soninke and Mande kept their history in oral tradition. Rwanda's pre-colonial history was also kept orally, by court historians and storytellers. What are the strengths and weaknesses of oral tradition as evidence, compared with written accounts by outsiders?
CrashCourse, "Mansa Musa and Islam in Africa: Crash Course World History #16". Watch for how trade brought Islam to West Africa, how Mali's rulers combined Islam with older traditions, and what Mansa Musa's pilgrimage shows about Mali's wealth and reputation.
Practice
Key points
Sources and credits
Written by Ganzaa: the source analysis, the map, the case discussion and the exercises. This lesson adapts CC BY-SA material and is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Quick check
Why was 'Kaya Maghan' (king of gold) a fitting title for Ghana's king?