Kingdoms and Empires in West, Central and South Africa
Senior 4 · History
Kingdoms and Empires in West, Central and South Africa
Lesson 4 of 5
25 min
The first source for this lesson is a stone wall. Look closely at it before reading on: there is no cement or mortar between the blocks. The granite was split into roughly equal blocks and laid in courses, each holding the next by weight and skill alone.

Construction at Great Zimbabwe began in the 11th century and continued for over 300 years; the Great Enclosure was built in the 13th and 14th centuries and probably served as the royal residence. At its peak the city may have had about 18,000 people. It is the largest stone structure in pre-colonial southern Africa.
The source also has a colonial history. In 1871 the German explorer Karl Mauch saw the ruins and at once ruled out construction by Africans, linking them instead to the Queen of Sheba and to Phoenicians. White settlers repeated the legend, and in the 20th century the white government of Rhodesia pressured archaeologists to deny that Black Africans had built it. Archaeology has refuted these "fantastical and dehumanising theories": Great Zimbabwe was built by the Shona. You will meet the same pattern in Rwanda's history: colonial writers who refused to believe Africans could build states invented foreign origins for them (Unit 8).
Definition
Zimbabwe (Shona: stone enclosure or court): a walled royal centre. Mwenemutapa: the title of the Mutapa ruler ("lord of the conquered land"); the Portuguese wrote it as "Monomotapa". Amabutho (singular ibutho): Zulu age-regiments, groups of young men of the same age trained and kept together as a standing army. Mfecane ("crushing"): a period of war and upheaval in southern Africa, about 1815 to 1840.

Older histories described the Mfecane as a storm of destruction set off by Shaka's wars, with traditional estimates of 1 to 2 million deaths. In 1988 the historian Julian Cobbing argued that this picture was a self-serving product of apartheid-era historians, who blamed Africans for "Black-on-Black destruction"; he pointed instead to the labour demands of Portuguese slave traders at Delagoa Bay and of European settlers in the Cape Colony. Other scholars now lower the death toll and stress complex political, economic and environmental causes. The debate shows how the politics of the present can shape the writing of the past.
Warning
Avoid the "savage warrior king" stereotype. Shaka used diplomacy as well as war, and Zulu power drew on older practices. Explain his success with evidence (regiments, tactics, alliances, absorption of neighbours) and treat colonial-era accounts of him, like Mauch's claims about Great Zimbabwe, as sources to question.
Tip
Two kingdoms, two foreign pressures: Mutapa met the Portuguese, who came for gold and worked through trade, religion and finally war (Masapa, 1629). The Zulu met the Boers and the British, who came for land and labour and finished with war (Ulundi, 1879). Compare what the outsiders wanted and how Africans responded.
Important
Discuss. Colonial writers refused to believe Africans built Great Zimbabwe, and invented foreign builders. In Rwanda, colonial writers invented foreign origins for some Rwandans. Why did colonisers need such theories? What harm did they do then, and what harm can they still do today?
UNESCO, "Great Zimbabwe National Monument (UNESCO/NHK)". A short film of the site. The narration mentions the old legend linking the ruins to the Queen of Sheba before calling them a testimony to the Shona civilisation: notice how the film handles the legend, and use the lesson to judge it.
Practice
Key points
Sources and credits
Written by Ganzaa: the source analysis, the map, the case studies and the exercises. This lesson adapts CC BY-SA material and is shared under CC BY-SA 4.0.
Quick check
What does the absence of mortar in the walls of Great Zimbabwe show?